Approaching Appraisal: Framing criteria for selecting digital content for preservation
Digital preservation practitioners are often asked to make collection and preservation decisions about content they steward; more often than not this is simply because a collection contains or is solely composed of digital content. However, traditional preservation practitioners typically do not make these same decisions in a vacuum for analog collections; they are informed and prioritized by selectors, liaisons, or curators who make decisions based on con- tent and collection priorities in concert with information provided by the preservation practitioners.
In this paper, we argue that this model should not change sim- ply because the nature of the materials has changed. While digital preservation may be new to an institution, basic preservation decisions are best prioritized by the people building collections and selecting content, which is complemented by the knowledge and expertise from digital preservation practitioners.
Selectors and curators are collaborative preservation partners whose roles and expertise render them best able to judge the value of the content they collect. Digital preservation practitioners have an obligation to work with selectors and curators to help them understand the ways in which technical characteristics, descriptive records, and financial impact, along with value, affect selection choices for digital content and how these choices affect a digital preservation program. Digital preservation practitioners need to provide selectors and curators with guidelines and criteria to help them make informed selection decisions for digital content.
In this paper, we will address this issue in five parts. First, we review existing literature and workflows on the issue of selection for general collections. Second, we review existing literature on the topic of appraisal in special collections. Third, we provide an analysis of how these practices compare and contrast. Fourth, we discuss differences between preserving analog and digital content. Finally, we recommend specific guidelines and criteria geared toward selectors and curators to aid with content selection for digital preservation in both general and special collections.
Files
-
View: ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_tallmanWork_ipres2018_2018-10-08.pdf
Download: ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_tallmanWork_ipres2018_2018-10-08.pdf
Metadata
Work Title Approaching Appraisal: Framing criteria for selecting digital content for preservation Access Creators - Nathan Tallman
- Lauren Work
Keyword - Appraisal
- Digital preservation
- Selection
- Digital preservation practitioner
- Digital content
- Digital preservation librarian
- Collection development
- Collection management
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution) Work Type Article Publisher - International Digital Conference on Preservation 2018
Publication Date September 20, 2018 Related URLs Deposited February 19, 2020 Versions
Analytics
Collections
Work History
Version 1
published-
Created
-
Added
tallmanWork_ipres2018_2018-10-08.pdf -
Added Creator Nathan Tallman
-
Added Creator Lauren Work
-
Published
-
Updated
-
Updated
-
Updated
Version 2
published-
Created
-
Deleted
tallmanWork_ipres2018_2018-10-08.pdf -
Added
ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_tallmanWork_ipres2018_2018-10-08.pdf -
Updated
-
Published
-
Updated
-
Updated Work Title Show ChangesWork Title
Approaching Appraisal [article]- Approaching Appraisal: Framing criteria for selecting digital content for preservation
-
Updated Keyword, Subtitle, Publisher, and 1 more Show ChangesKeywordSubtitle
appraisal, digital preservation, selection- Appraisal, Digital preservation, Selection, Digital preservation practitioner, Digital content, Digital preservation librarian, Collection development, Collection management
PublisherFraming criteria for selecting digital content for preservation
DescriptionInternational Digital Conference on Preservation- International Digital Conference on Preservation 2018
Digital preservation practitioners are often asked to make collec- tion and preservation decisions about content they steward; more often than not this is simply because a collection contains or is solely composed of digital content. However, traditional preserva- tion practitioners typically do not make these same decisions in a vacuum for analog collections; they are informed and prioritized by selectors, liaisons, or curators who make decisions based on con- tent and collection priorities in concert with information provided by the preservation practitioners. In this paper, we argue that this model should not change sim- ply because the nature of the materials has changed. While digital preservation may be new to an institution, basic preservation de- cisions are best prioritized by the people building collections and selecting content, which is complemented by the knowledge and expertise from digital preservation practitioners. Selectors and curators are collaborative preservation partners whose roles and expertise render them best able to judge the value of the content they collect. Digital preservation practitioners have an obligation to work with selectors and curators to help them understand the ways in which technical characteristics, descriptive records, and financial impact, along with value, affect selection choices for digital content and how these choices affect a digital preservation program. Digital preservation practitioners need to provide selectors and curators with guidelines and criteria to help them make informed selection decisions for digital content. In this paper, we will address this issue in five parts. First, we review existing literature and workflows on the issue of selection for general collections. Second, we review existing literature on the topic of appraisal in special collections. Third, we provide an analysis of how these practices compare and contrast. Fourth, we discuss differences between preserving analog and digital content. Finally, we recommend specific guidelines and criteria geared to- ward selectors and curators to aid with content selection for digital preservation in both general and special collections.- Digital preservation practitioners are often asked to make collection and preservation decisions about content they steward; more often than not this is simply because a collection contains or is solely composed of digital content. However, traditional preservation practitioners typically do not make these same decisions in a vacuum for analog collections; they are informed and prioritized by selectors, liaisons, or curators who make decisions based on con- tent and collection priorities in concert with information provided by the preservation practitioners.
- In this paper, we argue that this model should not change sim- ply because the nature of the materials has changed. While digital preservation may be new to an institution, basic preservation decisions are best prioritized by the people building collections and selecting content, which is complemented by the knowledge and expertise from digital preservation practitioners.
- Selectors and curators are collaborative preservation partners whose roles and expertise render them best able to judge the value of the content they collect. Digital preservation practitioners have an obligation to work with selectors and curators to help them understand the ways in which technical characteristics, descriptive records, and financial impact, along with value, affect selection choices for digital content and how these choices affect a digital preservation program. Digital preservation practitioners need to provide selectors and curators with guidelines and criteria to help them make informed selection decisions for digital content.
- In this paper, we will address this issue in five parts. First, we review existing literature and workflows on the issue of selection for general collections. Second, we review existing literature on the topic of appraisal in special collections. Third, we provide an analysis of how these practices compare and contrast. Fourth, we discuss differences between preserving analog and digital content. Finally, we recommend specific guidelines and criteria geared toward selectors and curators to aid with content selection for digital preservation in both general and special collections.