Index Insurance and Climate Risk Management: Addressing Social Equity
Fair distribution of benefits from index insurance matters. Lack of attention to social equity can reinforce inequalities and undermine the potential index insurance holds as a tool for climate risk management that is also pro-poor. The aims of this article are to: (a) examine social equity concerns raised by index insurance in the context of climate risk management, (b) consider how greater attention can be paid to social equity in index insurance initiatives, and (c) reflect on the policy challenges raised by taking social equity into account as a mechanism for climate risk reduction. The article draws on learning from the CGIAR's Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and presents the cases of the Index Based Livelihoods Insurance (IBLI) and Agriculture and Climate Risk Enterprise Ltd. (ACRE) in East Africa. It proposes a framework for unpacking social equity related to equitable access, procedures, representation and distribution within index insurance schemes. The framework facilitates identification of opportunities for building outcomes that are more equitable, with greater potential for inclusion and fairer distribution of benefits related to index insurance. The article argues that systematically addressing social equity raises hard policy choices for index insurance initiatives without straightforward solutions. Attention to how benefits and burdens of index insurance are distributed, suggests the unpalatable truth for development policy that the poorest members of rural society can be excluded. Nevertheless, a focus on social equity—facilitated by the framework—opens up opportunities to ensure index insurance is linked to more socially just climate risk management. At the very least, it may prevent index insurance from generating greater inequality. Taking social equity into account, thus, shifts the focus from agricultural systems in transition per se to systems with potential to incorporate societal transformation through distributive justice.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Index insurance and climate risk management: Addressing social equity. Development Policy Review 37, 5 p581-602 (2018)], which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12387. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions: https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html#3.
Files
-
View: 2018_Fisher_et_al_Development_Policy_Review-1.pdf
Download: 2018_Fisher_et_al_Development_Policy_Review-1.pdf
Metadata
Work Title Index Insurance and Climate Risk Management: Addressing Social Equity Access Creators - Eleanor Fisher
- Jon Hellin
- Helen Greatrex
- Nathaniel Jensen
Keyword - climate risk management
- index insurance
- social equity
- inequality
- agriculture
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved) Work Type Article Publisher - Development Policy Review
Publication Date June 4, 2018 Publisher Identifier (DOI) - https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12387
Deposited June 18, 2025 Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.
Work History
Version 1
published-
Created
-
Added
2018_Fisher_et_al_Development_Policy_Review-1.pdf -
Added Creator Eleanor Fisher
-
Added Creator Jon Hellin
-
Added Creator Helen Greatrex
-
Added Creator Nathaniel Jensen
-
Published
-
Updated
-
Updated Keyword, Description Show ChangesKeywordDescription
- climate risk management , index insurance , social equity, inequality , agriculture
Fair distribution of benefits from index insurance matters. Lack of attention to social equity can reinforce inequalities and undermine the potential index insurance holds as a tool for climate risk management that is also pro‐poor. The aims of this article are to: (a) examine social equity concerns raised by index insurance in the context of climate risk management, (b) consider how greater attention can be paid to social equity in index insurance initiatives, and (c) reflect on the policy challenges raised by taking social equity into account as a mechanism for climate risk reduction. The article draws on learning from the CGIAR's Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and presents the cases of the Index Based Livelihoods Insurance (IBLI) and Agriculture and Climate Risk Enterprise Ltd. (ACRE) in East Africa. It proposes a framework for unpacking social equity related to equitable …- Fair distribution of benefits from index insurance matters. Lack of attention to social equity can reinforce inequalities and undermine the potential index insurance holds as a tool for climate risk management that is also pro-poor. The aims of this article are to: (a) examine social equity concerns raised by index insurance in the context of climate risk management, (b) consider how greater attention can be paid to social equity in index insurance initiatives, and (c) reflect on the policy challenges raised by taking social equity into account as a mechanism for climate risk reduction. The article draws on learning from the CGIAR's Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and presents the cases of the Index Based Livelihoods Insurance (IBLI) and Agriculture and Climate Risk Enterprise Ltd. (ACRE) in East Africa. It proposes a framework for unpacking social equity related to equitable access, procedures, representation and distribution within index insurance schemes. The framework facilitates identification of opportunities for building outcomes that are more equitable, with greater potential for inclusion and fairer distribution of benefits related to index insurance. The article argues that systematically addressing social equity raises hard policy choices for index insurance initiatives without straightforward solutions. Attention to how benefits and burdens of index insurance are distributed, suggests the unpalatable truth for development policy that the poorest members of rural society can be excluded. Nevertheless, a focus on social equity—facilitated by the framework—opens up opportunities to ensure index insurance is linked to more socially just climate risk management. At the very least, it may prevent index insurance from generating greater inequality. Taking social equity into account, thus, shifts the focus from agricultural systems in transition per se to systems with potential to incorporate societal transformation through distributive justice.
Version 2
published-
Created
-
Added
AccessibleCopy_7-15_Index_Insurance_and_Climate_Risk_Management.pdf -
Deleted
2018_Fisher_et_al_Development_Policy_Review-1.pdf -
Updated
-
Updated Creator Eleanor Fisher
-
Updated Creator Jon Hellin
-
Updated Creator Nathaniel Jensen
-
Published
