Thumbnail image for Claim denied: An examination of rejection in building a leader identity

Claim denied: An examination of rejection in building a leader identity

This study integrates the literature on internal mobility perspectives and leader identity construction theory to examine how rejection of leadership opportunities relates to key employee outcomes. Leader identity construction theory suggests that leadership advancement depends not only on individuals’ aspirations but also on the granting of the claim to leadership itself, whereas rejection from advancement may signal constrained organizational growth opportunities and diminished future leadership prospects. Drawing on these perspectives, this study examines whether rejection from different sources is associated with employee turnover, performance, and misconduct. Four source-based rejection variables serve as the focal predictors: current manager rejection, human resources (HR) rejection, hiring manager rejection, and self-rejection. These variables capture distinct pathways through which employees’ leadership aspirations may be denied by organizational actors or voluntarily withdrawn by applicants themselves. Claim consideration, defined as the average time applicants spend in the selection process, is examined as a moderator expected to shape the strength of these relationships. Control variables, including age, gender, and organizational tenure, are included to account for alternative explanations. Using archival organizational data, the analyses provide limited support for predicted relationships. Most hypothesized associations between rejection sources and employee outcomes were not statistically significant. However, hiring manager rejection was significantly associated with subsequent employee performance, suggesting that rejection delivered by the ultimate decision-maker most directly tied to the role may carry distinct behavioral implications. The largely null findings, coupled with the unique effect of hiring manager rejection on performance, point to more constrained and context-specific consequences of leadership claim rejection than existing theory would predict.

Files

  • View: Clark, Diana.pdf

    Download: Clark, Diana.pdf

    size: 821 KB | mime_type: application/pdf | date: 2026-06-23 | sha256: 5b166a0 | Request alternate format

Metadata

Work Title Claim denied: An examination of rejection in building a leader identity
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Diana M. Clark
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Work Type Professional Doctoral Culminating Experience
Sub Work Type Culminating Research Project
Program Business Administration
Degree Doctor of Business Administration
Publisher
  1. ScholarSphere
Publication Date June 2026
DOI doi:10.26207/catm-wn59
Deposited June 23, 2026

Versions

Analytics

Collections

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Updated
  • Updated Degree, Program, Description, and 2 more Show Changes
    Degree
    • Doctor of Business Administration
    Program
    • Business Administration
    Description
    • This study integrates the literature on internal mobility perspectives and leader identity construction theory to examine how rejection of leadership opportunities relates to key employee outcomes. Leader identity construction theory suggests that leadership advancement depends not only on individuals’ aspirations but also on the granting of the claim to leadership itself, whereas rejection from advancement may signal constrained organizational growth opportunities and diminished future leadership prospects. Drawing on these perspectives, this study examines whether rejection from different sources is associated with employee turnover, performance, and misconduct. Four source-based rejection variables serve as the focal predictors: current manager rejection, human resources (HR) rejection, hiring manager rejection, and self-rejection. These variables capture distinct pathways through which employees’ leadership aspirations may be denied by organizational actors or voluntarily withdrawn by applicants themselves. Claim consideration, defined as the average time applicants spend in the selection process, is examined as a moderator expected to shape the strength of these relationships. Control variables, including age, gender, and organizational tenure, are included to account for alternative explanations. Using archival organizational data, the analyses provide limited support for predicted relationships. Most hypothesized associations between rejection sources and employee outcomes were not statistically significant. However, hiring manager rejection was significantly associated with subsequent employee performance, suggesting that rejection delivered by the ultimate decision-maker most directly tied to the role may carry distinct behavioral implications. The largely null findings, coupled with the unique effect of hiring manager rejection on performance, point to more constrained and context-specific consequences of leadership claim rejection than existing theory would predict.
    Sub Work Type
    • Culminating Research Project
    Publication Date
    • 2026-06
  • Added Creator Diana Maryanne Clark
  • Added Creator Michael Waldhier
  • Added Clark, Diana.pdf
  • Deleted Clark, Diana.pdf
  • Added Clark, Diana.pdf
  • Deleted Clark, Diana.pdf
  • Added Clark, Diana.pdf
  • Updated License Show Changes
    License
    • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • Published Publisher Show Changes
    Publisher
    • ScholarSphere

Version 2
published

  • Created
  • Deleted Creator Michael Waldhier
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Renamed Creator Diana M. Clark Show Changes
    • Diana Maryanne Clark
    • Diana M. Clark