Thumbnail image for Sensitivity of shading calculations to horizon measurement accuracy

Sensitivity of shading calculations to horizon measurement accuracy

Residential or small scale commercial solar installations require site surveys in the planning stage to evaluate obstacles that may block light access to a planned array or collector. This can be done by remote sensing techniques and later refined by on-site evaluations. A variety of tools exist to perform these evaluations. Techniques are available in literature for calculating the effect of this known horizon profile on the expected irradiation available to the collector. In this paper, we evaluated the sensitivity of the irradiation to uncertainty in the horizon profile measurement using software written in Python. Uncertainty in both the azimuth and altitude of the horizon can originate from several sources depending on the tool being employed. The uncertainties in measurement couple with the various approximations made in the use of conventional tools such as System Advisor Model (SAM), to produce a cumulative uncertainty. In order to estimate the sensitivity, a set of hypothetical horizon profiles were generated and annual and monthly irradiation were estimated based on TMY3 solar resource data. Estimates of the impact of the horizon profile on the solar resource were made using shading calculation techniques from literature. Variations in the altitude and azimuth of the horizon profile were introduced and the resulting impact on the estimated irradiation is reported. This data may guide interpretation of site survey measurements and future tool development.

Part of the 43rd ASES National Solar Conference 2014, SOLAR 2014, Including the 39th National Passive Solar Conference and the 2nd Meeting of Young and Emerging Professionals in Renewable Energy - San Francisco, United States

Files

  • View: ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_Ranalli_2014_ASES_Shading_Accepted-1.pdf

    Download: ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_Ranalli_2014_ASES_Shading_Accepted-1.pdf

    size: 339 KB | mime_type: application/pdf | date: 2026-08-09 | sha256: 1613737 | Request alternate format

Metadata

Work Title Sensitivity of shading calculations to horizon measurement accuracy
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Joseph Ranalli
  2. Jeffrey R S Brownson
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. American Solar Energy Society
Publication Date July 2014
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. 9781510801790
Deposited August 08, 2026

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Ranalli_2014_ASES_Shading_Accepted-1.pdf
  • Added Creator Joseph Ranalli
  • Added Creator Jeffrey R S Brownson
  • Published
  • Updated

Version 2
published

  • Created
  • Deleted Ranalli_2014_ASES_Shading_Accepted-1.pdf
  • Added ACCESSIBLE_VERSION_Ranalli_2014_ASES_Shading_Accepted-1.pdf
  • Published
  • Updated Publisher, Publisher Identifier (DOI), Description, and 1 more Show Changes
    Publisher
    • American Solar Energy Society
    Publisher Identifier (DOI)
    • 9781510801790
    Description
    • Residential or small scale commercial solar installations require site surveys in the planning stage to evaluate obstacles that may block light access to a planned array or collector. This can be done by remote sensing techniques and later refined by on-site evaluations. A variety of tools exist to perform these evaluations. Techniques are available in literature for calculating the effect of this known horizon profile on the expected irradiation available to the collector. In this paper, we evaluated the sensitivity of the irradiation to uncertainty in the horizon profile measurement using software written in Python. Uncertainty in both the azimuth and altitude of the horizon can originate from several sources depending on the tool being employed. The uncertainties in measurement couple with the various approximations made in the use of conventional tools such as System Advisor Model (SAM), to produce a cumulative uncertainty. In order to estimate the sensitivity, a set of hypothetical horizon profiles were generated and annual and monthly irradiation were estimated based on TMY3 solar resource data. Estimates of the impact of the horizon profile on the solar resource were made using shading calculation techniques from literature. Variations in the altitude and azimuth of the horizon profile were introduced and the resulting impact on the estimated irradiation is reported. This data may guide interpretation of site survey measurements and future tool development.
    • Residential or small scale commercial solar installations require site surveys in the planning stage to evaluate obstacles that may block light access to a planned array or collector. This can be done by remote sensing techniques and later refined by on-site evaluations. A variety of tools exist to perform these evaluations. Techniques are available in literature for calculating the effect of this known horizon profile on the expected irradiation available to the collector. In this paper, we evaluated the sensitivity of the irradiation to uncertainty in the horizon profile measurement using software written in Python. Uncertainty in both the azimuth and altitude of the horizon can originate from several sources depending on the tool being employed. The uncertainties in measurement couple with the various approximations made in the use of conventional tools such as System Advisor Model (SAM), to produce a cumulative uncertainty. In order to estimate the sensitivity, a set of hypothetical horizon profiles were generated and annual and monthly irradiation were estimated based on TMY3 solar resource data. Estimates of the impact of the horizon profile on the solar resource were made using shading calculation techniques from literature. Variations in the altitude and azimuth of the horizon profile were introduced and the resulting impact on the estimated irradiation is reported. This data may guide interpretation of site survey measurements and future tool development.
    • *Part of the 43rd ASES National Solar Conference 2014, SOLAR 2014, Including the 39th National Passive Solar Conference and the 2nd Meeting of Young and Emerging Professionals in Renewable Energy - San Francisco, United States*
    Publication Date
    • 2014-01-01
    • 2014-07