Transculturation and the porosity of cultures: Fernando Ortiz

Fernando Ortiz introduced his account of transculturation to replace Melville Herskovits’s notion of acculturation as a way of describing the historical contact between cultures. Ortiz understood the idea of acculturation to be promoting a kind of assimilationist model very different from what he witnessed in his native Cuba. Transculturation conforms neither to the model of cosmopolitanism promoted by Kant’s universal history, nor to the kind of multiculturalism that is rooted in Herder’s rival approach to history. Instead, it presents a concept of cultural contact and cultural transformation that highlights the way the material and economic conditions of social existence shape the institutions in which cultures more narrowly conceived are embedded and relate to each other. By bringing transculturation into dialogue with the idea of the porosity of cultures initially promoted in 1925 by Walter Benjamin in his essay on Naples, we find a way to free transculturation from Ortiz’s tendency to lapse into biological metaphors with the danger of retaining a reference to cultural purity that he would not endorse. Transculturation, thus revised, recommends itself as a term helpful for thinking about a world shaped by mass migration and the new technological forms of ever more rapid cultural exchange. Properly understood, it promotes a future where openness and sharing are valued over ownership and preservation.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Transculturation and the porosity of cultures: Fernando Ortiz
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Robert Lambert Bernasconi
Keyword
  1. Transculturation
  2. Porosity of cultures
  3. Fernando Ortiz
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Diogenes
Publication Date February 28, 2024
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0392192124000051
Deposited March 31, 2025

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Transculturality_Delivery.docx
  • Added Creator Robert Lambert Bernasconi
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated Work Title Show Changes
    Work Title
    • Transculturality and the Porosity of Cultures
    • Transculturation and the porosity of cultures: Fernando Ortiz
  • Updated Keyword, Publisher, Publisher Identifier (DOI), and 1 more Show Changes
    Keyword
    • Transculturation, Porosity of cultures, Fernando Ortiz
    Publisher
    • The Saudi Journal of Philosophical Studies
    • Diogenes
    Publisher Identifier (DOI)
    • https://doi.org/10.1017/S0392192124000051
    Description
    • An examinaiton of the concept of transculturality with particular reference to Fernano Ortiz
    • Fernando Ortiz introduced his account of transculturation to replace Melville Herskovits’s notion of acculturation as a way of describing the historical contact between cultures. Ortiz understood the idea of acculturation to be promoting a kind of assimilationist model very different from what he witnessed in his native Cuba. Transculturation conforms neither to the model of cosmopolitanism promoted by Kant’s universal history, nor to the kind of multiculturalism that is rooted in Herder’s rival approach to history. Instead, it presents a concept of cultural contact and cultural transformation that highlights the way the material and economic conditions of social existence shape the institutions in which cultures more narrowly conceived are embedded and relate to each other. By bringing transculturation into dialogue with the idea of the porosity of cultures initially promoted in 1925 by Walter Benjamin in his essay on Naples, we find a way to free transculturation from Ortiz’s tendency to lapse into biological metaphors with the danger of retaining a reference to cultural purity that he would not endorse. Transculturation, thus revised, recommends itself as a term helpful for thinking about a world shaped by mass migration and the new technological forms of ever more rapid cultural exchange. Properly understood, it promotes a future where openness and sharing are valued over ownership and preservation.
  • Updated Publication Date Show Changes
    Publication Date
    • 2024-03-01
    • 2024-02-28