Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors' Resident Recruitment Subcouncil Position Paper on Residency Recruitment
Residency recruitment practices have undergone significant changes in the last several years. Interviews are now conducted fully virtually leading to both positive and negative downstream effects, including decreased cost to applicants and programs, decreased time away from clinical activities, flexibility in scheduling, and increased applications for applicants and program directors. In response to these changes, the Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors Council convened a workgroup consisting of program directors, program coordinators, residents, and medical students who reviewed the available literature to provide an evidence-based set of best practices for program leaders and applicants. Available data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and its relevance to future recruitment cycles are also discussed.
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. The published version of record [Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors’ Resident Recruitment Subcouncil Position Paper on Residency Recruitment. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 103, 6 p561-565 (2024)] is available online at: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002447.
Files
Metadata
| Work Title | Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors' Resident Recruitment Subcouncil Position Paper on Residency Recruitment |
|---|---|
| Access | |
| Creators |
|
| License | In Copyright (Rights Reserved) |
| Work Type | Article |
| Publisher |
|
| Publication Date | June 1, 2024 |
| Publisher Identifier (DOI) |
|
| Deposited | November 27, 2024 |
Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.