The inaccuracy of data from online surveys: A cautionary analysis
Online recruitment methods for survey-based studies have become increasingly common in social science research. However, they are susceptible to a high rate of participation by fraudulent research subjects. The current study identified fraudulent (i.e., “fake”) participants in an online research study of parents of 13 to 18-year-old adolescents, and compared demographic, anthropometric, and subjective health data between “fake” (N = 1084) and “real” (N = 197) participants. Of 1,281 subjects who started the eligibility survey, 84.6% were coded as “fake.” “Fake” participants were less diverse in race/ethnicity and more diverse in gender. Their depression symptoms were inflated, but ratings of perceived health were comparable to “real” participants. Well-established correlations, such as that between BMI and perceived health, were not replicated with “fake” participants. Online surveys are highly vulnerable to fraudulent research subjects whose participation compromises the validity and interpretability of results. The discussion provides a guide and recommendations for improving data quality in online survey research.
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01733-5
Files
Metadata
Work Title | The inaccuracy of data from online surveys: A cautionary analysis |
---|---|
Access | |
Creators |
|
Keyword |
|
License | In Copyright (Rights Reserved) |
Work Type | Article |
Publisher |
|
Publication Date | September 7, 2023 |
Publisher Identifier (DOI) |
|
Deposited | March 25, 2024 |
Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.