
Reconsidering the problem of common-method variance in organizational communication research
This manuscript details the different attributes associated with the problem of common-method variance. First, upon defining validity, we review the two primary ways by which scholars attempt to control for common-method variance, and in doing so discuss their merits. Second, we provide two alternative explanations that may also account for the appearance of disparate correlations, neither of which have to do with common-method variance. Finally, we offer a set of parsimonious solutions for the problem of common-method variance, namely CFA without correlated residuals or modeled method factors. Overall, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide guidance for organizational communication scholars when dealing with this problem.
Files
Metadata
Work Title | Reconsidering the problem of common-method variance in organizational communication research |
---|---|
Access | |
Creators |
|
Keyword |
|
License | CC BY-NC 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial) |
Work Type | Article |
Publisher |
|
Publication Date | January 3, 2024 |
Publisher Identifier (DOI) |
|
Deposited | January 03, 2024 |
Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.