Happiness and Disability: Emilie de Châtelet’s Adaptive Worldbuilding

In her Discours sur le bonheur and Institutions de physique, Emilie du Châtelet is dismissive of the ailing and the disabled. In the Discours, for instance, she writes that happiness for the old and the ailing involves things such as being warm enough, digesting chicken well, and using the commode. Similarly, in the Institutions de physique, she describes those who refuse to believe in Newtonian physics using various metaphors of disability. In both works, she discusses disabled individuals almost as another species altogether. It may, therefore, seem out of place to include her in conversations on the power of disabled bodies. However, in spite of her disparaging comments toward the ailing and disabled, a closer analysis of her work demonstrates that centuries before new materialist critics were discussing the “intra-action” of bodies (Barad), or disability studies scholars were discussing the possibility of dependency and care (Kittay), du Châtelet was introducing the concepts and the language that make it possible to bring these discourses together. Particularly, the 18th-century physicist’s work on “elastic bodies” imagines bodies that engage with and are dependent on other bodies for life and happiness, allowing for an entanglement of bodies that produces new life (outside of sexual reproduction), as well as new modes of being in the world. These entanglements allow us to think about her work on health and happiness in ways that the philosopher herself might never have imagined. In this essay, I will examine du Châtelet’s Discours sur le bonheur through the lens of her earlier writings on physics to demonstrate that not only does her work allow for the possibility of happiness within the disabled body, but it also imagines a world of happiness made possible only by considering the interdependency of bodies and the diversity of embodied experience.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Happiness and Disability: Emilie de Châtelet’s Adaptive Worldbuilding
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Tracy L Rutler
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. L'Esprit Créateur
Publication Date December 2021
Related URLs
Deposited August 18, 2022

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Happiness_and_Disability-REVISED.docx
  • Added Creator Tracy L Rutler
  • Published
  • Updated Subtitle, Publisher, Description, and 1 more Show Changes
    Subtitle
    • Special Issue: Disability's Worldmaking: Pasts and Futures
    Publisher
    • Esprit Créateur
    • L'Esprit Créateur
    Description
    • In her <i>Discours sur le bonheur</i> and <i>Institutions de physique</i>, Emilie du Châtelet<b> </b>is dismissive of the ailing and the disabled. In the <i>Discours</i>, for instance, she writes that happiness for the old and the ailing involves things such as being warm enough, digesting chicken well, and using the commode. Similarly, in the <i>Institutions de physique</i>, she describes those who refuse to believe in Newtonian physics using various metaphors of disability. In both works, she discusses disabled individuals almost as another species altogether. It may, therefore, seem out of place to include her in conversations on the power of disabled bodies. However, in spite of her disparaging comments toward the ailing and disabled, a closer analysis of her work demonstrates that centuries before new materialist critics were discussing the “intra-action” of bodies (Barad), or disability studies scholars were discussing the possibility of dependency and care (Kittay), du Châtelet was introducing the concepts and the language that make it possible to bring these discourses together. Particularly, the 18<sup>th</sup>-century physicist’s work on “elastic bodies” imagines bodies that engage with and are dependent on other bodies for life and happiness, allowing for an entanglement of bodies that produces new life (outside of sexual reproduction), as well as new modes of being in the world. These entanglements allow us to think about her work on health and happiness in ways that the philosopher herself might never have imagined. In this essay, I will examine du Châtelet’s <i>Discours sur le bonheur</i> through the lens of her earlier writings on physics to demonstrate that not only does her work allow for the possibility of happiness within the disabled body, but it also imagines a world of happiness made possible only by considering the interdependency of bodies and the diversity of embodied experience.
    • In her _Discours sur le bonheur_ and <i>Institutions de physique</i>, Emilie du Châtelet<b> </b>is dismissive of the ailing and the disabled. In the <i>Discours</i>, for instance, she writes that happiness for the old and the ailing involves things such as being warm enough, digesting chicken well, and using the commode. Similarly, in the <i>Institutions de physique</i>, she describes those who refuse to believe in Newtonian physics using various metaphors of disability. In both works, she discusses disabled individuals almost as another species altogether. It may, therefore, seem out of place to include her in conversations on the power of disabled bodies. However, in spite of her disparaging comments toward the ailing and disabled, a closer analysis of her work demonstrates that centuries before new materialist critics were discussing the “intra-action” of bodies (Barad), or disability studies scholars were discussing the possibility of dependency and care (Kittay), du Châtelet was introducing the concepts and the language that make it possible to bring these discourses together. Particularly, the 18<sup>th</sup>-century physicist’s work on “elastic bodies” imagines bodies that engage with and are dependent on other bodies for life and happiness, allowing for an entanglement of bodies that produces new life (outside of sexual reproduction), as well as new modes of being in the world. These entanglements allow us to think about her work on health and happiness in ways that the philosopher herself might never have imagined. In this essay, I will examine du Châtelet’s <i>Discours sur le bonheur</i> through the lens of her earlier writings on physics to demonstrate that not only does her work allow for the possibility of happiness within the disabled body, but it also imagines a world of happiness made possible only by considering the interdependency of bodies and the diversity of embodied experience.
    Publication Date
    • 2021-12-01
    • 2021-12
  • Updated Description Show Changes
    Description
    • In her _Discours sur le bonheur_ and <i>Institutions de physique</i>, Emilie du Châtelet<b> </b>is dismissive of the ailing and the disabled. In the <i>Discours</i>, for instance, she writes that happiness for the old and the ailing involves things such as being warm enough, digesting chicken well, and using the commode. Similarly, in the <i>Institutions de physique</i>, she describes those who refuse to believe in Newtonian physics using various metaphors of disability. In both works, she discusses disabled individuals almost as another species altogether. It may, therefore, seem out of place to include her in conversations on the power of disabled bodies. However, in spite of her disparaging comments toward the ailing and disabled, a closer analysis of her work demonstrates that centuries before new materialist critics were discussing the “intra-action” of bodies (Barad), or disability studies scholars were discussing the possibility of dependency and care (Kittay), du Châtelet was introducing the concepts and the language that make it possible to bring these discourses together. Particularly, the 18<sup>th</sup>-century physicist’s work on “elastic bodies” imagines bodies that engage with and are dependent on other bodies for life and happiness, allowing for an entanglement of bodies that produces new life (outside of sexual reproduction), as well as new modes of being in the world. These entanglements allow us to think about her work on health and happiness in ways that the philosopher herself might never have imagined. In this essay, I will examine du Châtelet’s <i>Discours sur le bonheur</i> through the lens of her earlier writings on physics to demonstrate that not only does her work allow for the possibility of happiness within the disabled body, but it also imagines a world of happiness made possible only by considering the interdependency of bodies and the diversity of embodied experience.
    • In her _Discours sur le bonheur_ and _Institutions de physique_, Emilie du Châtelet<b> </b>is dismissive of the ailing and the disabled. In the _Discours_, for instance, she writes that happiness for the old and the ailing involves things such as being warm enough, digesting chicken well, and using the commode. Similarly, in the _Institutions de physique_, she describes those who refuse to believe in Newtonian physics using various metaphors of disability. In both works, she discusses disabled individuals almost as another species altogether. It may, therefore, seem out of place to include her in conversations on the power of disabled bodies. However, in spite of her disparaging comments toward the ailing and disabled, a closer analysis of her work demonstrates that centuries before new materialist critics were discussing the “intra-action” of bodies (Barad), or disability studies scholars were discussing the possibility of dependency and care (Kittay), du Châtelet was introducing the concepts and the language that make it possible to bring these discourses together. Particularly, the 18<sup>th</sup>-century physicist’s work on “elastic bodies” imagines bodies that engage with and are dependent on other bodies for life and happiness, allowing for an entanglement of bodies that produces new life (outside of sexual reproduction), as well as new modes of being in the world. These entanglements allow us to think about her work on health and happiness in ways that the philosopher herself might never have imagined. In this essay, I will examine du Châtelet’s _Discours sur le bonheur_ through the lens of her earlier writings on physics to demonstrate that not only does her work allow for the possibility of happiness within the disabled body, but it also imagines a world of happiness made possible only by considering the interdependency of bodies and the diversity of embodied experience.
  • Updated Related URLs Show Changes
    Related URLs
    • https://muse.jhu.edu/article/845727
  • Updated