Patterns of cancer-related healthcare access across Pennsylvania: Analysis of novel census tract-level indicators of persistent poverty

Background: Persistent poverty census tracts have had ≥20% of the population living below the federal poverty line for 30+ years. We assessed the relationship between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access across census tracts in Pennsylvania.

Methods: We gathered publicly-available census tract-level data on persistent poverty, rurality, and sociodemographic variables, as well as potential access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of health insurance, last-year check-up), realized access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers), and self-reported cancer diagnosis. We used multivariable spatial regression models to assess the relationships between persistent poverty and each healthcare access indicator.

Results: Among Pennsylvania’s census tracts, 2,789 (89.8%) were classified as non-persistent poverty, and 316 (10.2%) were classified as persistent poverty (113 did not have valid data on persistent poverty). Persistent poverty tracts had lower prevalence of health insurance (estimate=-1.70, standard error [SE]=0.10), screening for cervical cancer (estimate=-4.00, SE=0.17) and colorectal cancer (estimate=-3.13, SE=0.20), and cancer diagnosis (estimate=-0.34, SE=0.05), compared to non-persistent poverty tracts (all p<.001). However, persistent poverty tracts had higher prevalence of last-year check-up (estimate=0.22, SE=0.08) and screening for breast cancer (estimate=0.56, SE=0.15) (both p<.01).

Conclusions: Relationships between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access outcomes differed in direction and magnitude. Health promotion interventions should leverage data at fine-grained geographic units (e.g., census tracts) to motivate focus on communities or outcomes.

Impact: Future studies should extend these analyses to other states and outcomes to inform public health research and interventions to reduce geographic disparities.

Find the version of record at https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1255

Files

Metadata

Work Title Patterns of cancer-related healthcare access across Pennsylvania: Analysis of novel census tract-level indicators of persistent poverty
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Jennifer L. Moss
  2. Nathaniel R. Geyer
  3. Eugene J. Lengerich
Keyword
  1. Persistent poverty
  2. Access to care
  3. Cancer prevention and control
  4. Health geography
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Publication Date April 3, 2024
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1255
Deposited March 26, 2024

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added CT-persistent-poverty-access_RR_manuscript_clean.docx
  • Added Creator Jennifer Moss
  • Added Creator Nathaniel R Geyer
  • Added Creator E J Lengerich
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated Keyword, Description, Publication Date Show Changes
    Keyword
    • Persistent poverty, Access to care, Cancer prevention and control, Health geography
    Description
    • Background. Persistent poverty census tracts have had ≥20% of the population living below the federal poverty line for 30+ years. We assessed the relationship between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access across census tracts in Pennsylvania.
    • Methods. We gathered publicly-available census tract-level data on persistent poverty, rurality, and sociodemographic variables, as well as potential access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of health insurance, last-year check-up), realized access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers), and self-reported cancer diagnosis. We used multivariable spatial regression models to assess the relationships between persistent poverty and each healthcare access indicator.
    • Results. Among Pennsylvania’s census tracts, 2,789 (89.8%) were classified as non-persistent poverty, and 316 (10.2%) were classified as persistent poverty (113 did not have valid data on persistent poverty). Persistent poverty tracts had lower prevalence of health insurance (estimate=-1.70, standard error [SE]=0.10), screening for cervical cancer (estimate=-4.00, SE=0.17) and colorectal cancer (estimate=-3.13, SE=0.20), and cancer diagnosis (estimate=-0.34, SE=0.05), compared to non-persistent poverty tracts (all p<.001). However, persistent poverty tracts had higher prevalence of last-year check-up (estimate=0.22, SE=0.08) and screening for breast cancer (estimate=0.56, SE=0.15) (both p<.01).
    • Conclusions. Relationships between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access outcomes differed in direction and magnitude. Health promotion interventions should leverage data at fine-grained geographic units (e.g., census tracts) to motivate focus on communities or outcomes.
    • Impact. Future studies should extend these analyses to other states and outcomes to inform public health research and interventions to reduce geographic disparities.
    • Background: Persistent poverty census tracts have had ≥20% of the population living below the federal poverty line for 30+ years. We assessed the relationship between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access across census tracts in Pennsylvania.
    • Methods: We gathered publicly-available census tract-level data on persistent poverty, rurality, and sociodemographic variables, as well as potential access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of health insurance, last-year check-up), realized access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers), and self-reported cancer diagnosis. We used multivariable spatial regression models to assess the relationships between persistent poverty and each healthcare access indicator.
    • Results: Among Pennsylvania’s census tracts, 2,789 (89.8%) were classified as non-persistent poverty, and 316 (10.2%) were classified as persistent poverty (113 did not have valid data on persistent poverty). Persistent poverty tracts had lower prevalence of health insurance (estimate=-1.70, standard error [SE]=0.10), screening for cervical cancer (estimate=-4.00, SE=0.17) and colorectal cancer (estimate=-3.13, SE=0.20), and cancer diagnosis (estimate=-0.34, SE=0.05), compared to non-persistent poverty tracts (all p<.001). However, persistent poverty tracts had higher prevalence of last-year check-up (estimate=0.22, SE=0.08) and screening for breast cancer (estimate=0.56, SE=0.15) (both p<.01).
    • Conclusions: Relationships between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access outcomes differed in direction and magnitude. Health promotion interventions should leverage data at fine-grained geographic units (e.g., census tracts) to motivate focus on communities or outcomes.
    • Impact: Future studies should extend these analyses to other states and outcomes to inform public health research and interventions to reduce geographic disparities.
    Publication Date
    • 2024-02-01
    • 2024-04-03
  • Renamed Creator Jennifer L. Moss Show Changes
    • Jennifer Moss
    • Jennifer L. Moss
  • Renamed Creator Nathaniel R. Geyer Show Changes
    • Nathaniel R Geyer
    • Nathaniel R. Geyer
  • Renamed Creator Eugene J. Lengerich Show Changes
    • E J Lengerich
    • Eugene J. Lengerich