Second Moment Closure Modeling and DNS of Stratified Shear Layers

Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure.

For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.

© 2021, ASME. Originally published in ASME 2021 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Second Moment Closure Modeling and DNS of Stratified Shear Layers
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Naman Jain
  2. Xinyi Huang
  3. Xiang Yang
  4. Robert Kunz
  5. Hieu T. Pham
  6. Sutanu Sarkar
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Publication Date August 10, 2021
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. 10.1115/fedsm2021-65570
Source
  1. Volume 3: Fluid Mechanics; Micro and Nano Fluid Dynamics; Multiphase Flow
Deposited April 25, 2022

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added FEDSM2021-65570_draft_submitted-1.pdf

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Naman Jain

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Xinyi Huang

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Xiang Yang

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Robert Kunz

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Hieu T. Pham

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Added Creator Sutanu Sarkar

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Published

    April 25, 2022 15:26 by Scholarly Communications and Copyright

  • Updated Work Title, Description Show Changes

    April 26, 2022 10:47 by sre53

    Work Title
    • SECOND MOMENT CLOSURE MODELING AND DNS OF STRATIFIED SHEAR LAYERS
    • Second Moment Closure Modeling and DNS of Stratified Shear Layers
    Description
    • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
    • <jats:p>Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure.</jats:p>
    • <jats:p>For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.</jats:p>
    • Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure.</jats:p>
    • <jats:p>For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.
  • Updated Description Show Changes

    April 26, 2022 10:48 by sre53

    Description
    • Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure.</jats:p>
    • <jats:p>For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.
    • Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure.
    • For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.
  • Updated

    April 04, 2024 10:21 by [unknown user]