Human and Animal Well-Being

There is almost no theoretical discussion of non-human animal well-being in the philosophical literature on well-being. To begin to rectify this, I develop a desire satisfaction theory of well-being for animals. I contrast this theory with my desire theory of well-being for humans, according to which a human benefits from satisfying desires for which she can offer reasons. I consider objections. The most important are (1) Eden Lin's claim that the correct theory of well-being cannot vary across different welfare subjects and (2) his objection against theories of human well-being that require exercising a sophisticated capacity such as reason giving.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Human and Animal Well-Being
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Donald W. Bruckner
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Publication Date September 1, 2021
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12362
Deposited November 18, 2021

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Human_and_Animal_Well-Being_Final_for_PPQ.docx
  • Added Creator Donald W. Bruckner
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated
  • Updated