Physical productivity of new firms: it is not as high as it appears

This paper argues that the physical productivity of new firms is not as high as it is measured with conventional approaches. The overestimation is due to two reasons, both of which are related to the underestimation of production inputs of new firms. On the extensive margin, while conventional approaches implicitly assume the share of production costs in the total costs is the same for all firms, new firms spend a larger share of their costs on production. On the intensive margin, conventional approaches usually use capital stock as the proxy for capital input and tacitly assume a constant ratio between capital service and capital stock, whereas new firms tend to use their capital more intensively. Failure to incorporate the two facts leads to economically significant inflation in the measured physical productivity of new firms.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Physical productivity of new firms: it is not as high as it appears
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Xuebing Yang
  2. Lili Chen
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Applied Economics
Publication Date August 27, 2019
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1591609
Deposited November 22, 2021

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Physical_Productivity_of_New_Firms_-_UK_20181112.pdf
  • Added Creator Xuebing Yang
  • Added Creator Lili Chen
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated