Effect of Hemp Extraction Procedures on Cannabinoid and Terpenoid Composition

A variety of techniques have been developed to extract hemp phytochemicals for research and consumption. Some of the most common processes in the industry include supercritical CO2 extraction, hydrodistillation, and solvent-based (ethanol) extractions. Each of these processes has the potential to differentially extract various phytochemicals, which would impact their efficacy, tolerability, and safety. However, despite these differences, there has been no direct comparison of the methods and the resulting phytochemical composition. This work aimed to compare cannabinoid and terpene profiles using the three primary commercial procedures, using hemp inflorescence from a CBD/CBG dominant Cannabis sativa L. cultivar. Extracts were then evaluated for their terpene and cannabinoid content using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. Hydrodistilled extracts contained the most variety and abundance of terpenes with β-caryophyllene to be the most concentrated terpene (25–42 mg/g). Supercritical CO2 extracts displayed a minimal variety of terpenes, but the most variety and abundance of cannabinoids with CBD ranging from 12.8–20.6 mg/g. Ethanol extracts contained the most acidic cannabinoids with 3.2–4.1 mg/g of CBDA along with minor terpene levels. The resulting extracts demonstrated substantially different chemical profiles and highlight how the process used to extract hemp can play a large role in product composition and potential biological effects.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Effect of Hemp Extraction Procedures on Cannabinoid and Terpenoid Composition
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Francisco T. Chacon
  2. Wesley Raup-Konsavage
  3. Kent Vrana
  4. Joshua Kellogg
Keyword
  1. Terpenoid
  2. Cannabinoid
  3. Cannabis Sativa
  4. Phase Composition
  5. Isolation Method
  6. Extraction Methods
  7. Cannabinoids
  8. Hemp
  9. Terpenes
  10. Monoterpene
  11. Carbon Dioxide
  12. Phytochemical
  13. Phytochemicals
  14. Caryophyllene
  15. Tolerability
  16. Terpene
  17. Cannabis
  18. Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (Lc Ms/Ms)
  19. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
  20. Solvent Extraction
  21. Product Composition
  22. Ethanol Extract
  23. Chemical Profile
  24. Biological Effects
  25. Common Processes
  26. Co2 Solvent
  27. Supercritical Co2 Extraction
  28. Phytochemical Composition
  29. Hydrodistillation
  30. Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  31. Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
  32. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Gcms)
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Plants
Publication Date August 1, 2024
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. 10.3390/plants13162222
Related URLs
Deposited February 10, 2025

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Updated
  • Added Creator Francisco T. Chacon
  • Added Creator Wesley Raup-Konsavage
  • Added Creator Kent Vrana
  • Added Creator Joshua Kellogg
  • Updated Keyword, Publisher, Publisher Identifier (DOI), and 3 more Show Changes
    Keyword
    • Terpenoid, Cannabinoid, Cannabis Sativa, Phase Composition, Isolation Method, Extraction Methods, Cannabinoids, Hemp, Terpenes, Monoterpene, Carbon Dioxide, Phytochemical, Phytochemicals, Caryophyllene, Tolerability, Terpene, Cannabis, Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (Lc Ms/Ms), Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry, Solvent Extraction, Product Composition, Ethanol Extract, Chemical Profile, Biological Effects, Common Processes, Co2 Solvent, Supercritical Co2 Extraction, Phytochemical Composition, Hydrodistillation, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Gcms)
    Publisher
    • Plants
    Publisher Identifier (DOI)
    • 10.3390/plants13162222
    Related URLs
    • https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162222
    Description
    • <p>A variety of techniques have been developed to extract hemp phytochemicals for research and consumption. Some of the most common processes in the industry include supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction, hydrodistillation, and solvent-based (ethanol) extractions. Each of these processes has the potential to differentially extract various phytochemicals, which would impact their efficacy, tolerability, and safety. However, despite these differences, there has been no direct comparison of the methods and the resulting phytochemical composition. This work aimed to compare cannabinoid and terpene profiles using the three primary commercial procedures, using hemp inflorescence from a CBD/CBG dominant Cannabis sativa L. cultivar. Extracts were then evaluated for their terpene and cannabinoid content using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. Hydrodistilled extracts contained the most variety and abundance of terpenes with β-caryophyllene to be the most concentrated terpene (25–42 mg/g). Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extracts displayed a minimal variety of terpenes, but the most variety and abundance of cannabinoids with CBD ranging from 12.8–20.6 mg/g. Ethanol extracts contained the most acidic cannabinoids with 3.2–4.1 mg/g of CBDA along with minor terpene levels. The resulting extracts demonstrated substantially different chemical profiles and highlight how the process used to extract hemp can play a large role in product composition and potential biological effects.</p>
    Publication Date
    • 2024-08-01
  • Updated
  • Updated
  • Updated Creator Francisco T. Chacon
  • Updated Creator Wesley Raup-Konsavage
  • Updated Creator Kent Vrana
  • Updated Creator Joshua Kellogg
  • Added Chacon et al_2024_Effect of Hemp Extraction Procedures on Cannabinoid and Terpenoid Composition.pdf
  • Added Supporting_Information_GC_Feature_List_Summary.csv
  • Added Supporting_Information.pdf
  • Updated License Show Changes
    License
    • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • Published
  • Updated