BIBFRAME Must Die, Part III: A Brief History of the Future of Cataloging

This paper continues the arguments laid out in parts I and II (https://doi.org/10.26207/v18m-0g05 and https://doi.org/10.26207/2zm0-yf35). It argues that cataloging practice need not be aligned with IFLA's Library Reference Model (LRM) and that the movement to switch from MARC to BIBFRAME, led by the Library of Congress (LC) and the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), is both pointless and futile.

Files

Metadata

Work Title BIBFRAME Must Die, Part III: A Brief History of the Future of Cataloging
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. JEFF EDMUNDS
Keyword
  1. BIBFRAME
  2. Official RDA Toolkit
  3. Library Reference Model
  4. cataloging
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Work Type Article
Publication Date December 22, 2024
DOI doi:10.26207/zn7t-0y56
Deposited December 22, 2024

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Updated
  • Updated Keyword, Description, Publication Date Show Changes
    Keyword
    • BIBFRAME, Official RDA Toolkit, Library Reference Model, cataloging
    Description
    • This paper continues the arguments laid out in parts I and II (https://doi.org/10.26207/v18m-0g05 and https://doi.org/10.26207/2zm0-yf35). It argues that cataloging practice need not be aligned with IFLA's Library Reference Model (LRM) and that the movement to switch from MARC to BIBFRAME, led by the Library of Congress (LC) and the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), is both pointless and futile.
    Publication Date
    • 2024-12-22
  • Added Creator JEFF EDMUNDS
  • Added BIBFRAMEMustDiePartIII.pdf
  • Added README.txt
  • Updated License Show Changes
    License
    • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • Published
  • Updated