Comparing signal-contingent and event-contingent experience sampling ratings of affect in outpatients with borderline personality disorder or anxiety disorder

Experience sampling methods are widely used in clinical psychology to study affective dynamics in psychopathology. The present study examined whether affect ratings (valence and arousal) differed as a function of assessment schedule (signal- versus event-contingent) in a clinical sample and considered various approaches to modeling these ratings. A total of 40 community mental health center outpatients completed ratings of their affective experiences over a 21-day period using both signal-contingent schedules (random prompts) and event-contingent schedules (ratings following social interactions). We tested whether assessment schedules impacted 1) the central tendency (mean) and variability (standard deviation) of valence or arousal considered individually, 2) the joint variability in valence and arousal via the entropy metric, and 3) the between-person differences in configuration of valence-arousal landscapes via the Earth Mover’s Distance (EMD) metric. We found that event-contingent schedules, relative to signal-contingent schedules, captured higher average levels of pleasant valence and emotional arousal ratings. Moreover, signal-contingent schedules captured greater variability within and between individuals on arousal-valence landscapes compared to event-contingent schedules. Altogether, findings suggest that the two assessment schedules should not be treated interchangeably in the assessment of affect over time. Researchers must be cautious in generalizing results across studies utilizing different experience sampling assessment schedules.

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in 'Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment'. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09766-7. The following terms of use apply: https://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/publication-policies/aam-terms-of-use.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Comparing signal-contingent and event-contingent experience sampling ratings of affect in outpatients with borderline personality disorder or anxiety disorder
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Sindes Dawood
  2. Michael N. Hallquist
  3. Aaron L. Pincus
  4. Nilam Ram
  5. Michelle G. Newman
  6. Stephen J. Wilson
  7. Kenneth N. Levy
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication Date November 27, 2019
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. 10.1007/s10862-019-09766-7
Source
  1. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Deposited January 13, 2022

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added ESMaffectpaper_R2_v1_9.21.19-1.pdf
  • Added Creator Sindes Dawood
  • Added Creator Michael N. Hallquist
  • Added Creator Aaron L. Pincus
  • Added Creator Nilam Ram
  • Added Creator Michelle G. Newman
  • Added Creator Stephen J. Wilson
  • Added Creator Kenneth N. Levy
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated