Double vulnerability? Examining the effect of living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion Medicaid states on health status among working-age adults in the United States, 2022–2024

Objective: To examine whether living in nonmetropolitan areas within a state that has not expanded Medicaid is associated with poor/fair self-reported health status among working-age adults in the United States.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 2022-2024 Current Population Survey (n=220,601, ages 25-64). Self-reported health was dichotomized as having reported poor/fair or good/very good/excellent health status. We produced a four-level measure of the overlap between residential and policy contexts indicating whether the respondent lived in a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area within a state that had or had not expanded Medicaid coverage by 2023. Hierarchical linear models, were fit following a logisctic distribution to examine the association between our measure of residence-policy overlaps and poor/fair self-reported health status while accounting for individual and state-level characteristics.

Results: About 3.7% of respondents resided in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states. Approximately 11.4% of respondents reported poor/fair self-reported health, with respondents living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states having the highest rates of poor/fair self-reported health status (18.1%). Living in a nonmetropolitan area within non-expansion states was associated with higher probability of reporting poor/fair self-reported health status for the overall population and by sex.

Conclusion: In this nationally representative and racially diverse sample, we found that individuals residing in nonmetropolitan areas in non-expansion Medicaid states were more likely to report poor/fair self-reported health status. This effect was present for the majority of the population subgroups. Our findings underscore the double vulnerability faced by populations living in these residence-policy overlaps and the need for targeted interventions.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Double vulnerability? Examining the effect of living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion Medicaid states on health status among working-age adults in the United States, 2022–2024
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Michael D. Segovia
  2. P. Johnelle Sparks
  3. Alexis R. Santos-Lozada
Keyword
  1. Self-reported health
  2. Rural-urban disparities
  3. Policy context
  4. Health policy
License CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. SSM - Population Health
Publication Date April 10, 2025
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101798
Deposited May 17, 2025

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added 1-s2.0-S2352827325000527-main-1.pdf
  • Added Creator Michael D. Segovia
  • Added Creator P. Johnelle Sparks
  • Added Creator Alexis Santos
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated Keyword, Description, Publication Date Show Changes
    Keyword
    • Self-reported health, Rural-urban disparities, Policy context, Health policy
    Description
    • <b>Objective:</b> To examine whether living in nonmetropolitan areas within a state that has not expanded Medicaid is associated with poor/fair self-reported health status among working-age adults in the United States. <b>Methods: </b>We analyzed data from the 2022-2024 Current Population Survey (n=220,601, ages 25-64). Self-reported health was dichotomized as having reported poor/fair or good/very good/excellent health status. We produced a four-level measure of the overlap between residential and policy contexts indicating whether the respondent lived in a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area within a state that had or had not expanded Medicaid coverage by 2023. Hierarchical linear models, were fit following a logisctic distribution to examine the association between our measure of residence-policy overlaps and poor/fair self-reported health status while accounting for individual and state-level characteristics. <b>Results:</b> About 3.7% of respondents resided in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states. Approximately 11.4% of respondents reported poor/fair self-reported health, with respondents living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states having the highest rates of poor/fair self-reported health status (18.1%). Living in a nonmetropolitan area within non-expansion states was associated with higher probability of reporting poor/fair self-reported health status for the overall population and by sex. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this nationally representative and racially diverse sample, we found that individuals residing in nonmetropolitan areas in non-expansion Medicaid states were more likely to report poor/fair self-reported health status. This effect was present for the majority of the population subgroups. Our findings underscore the double vulnerability faced by populations living in these residence-policy overlaps and the need for targeted interventions.
    • <b>Objective:</b> To examine whether living in nonmetropolitan areas within a state that has not expanded Medicaid is associated with poor/fair self-reported health status among working-age adults in the United States.
    • <b>Methods: </b>We analyzed data from the 2022-2024 Current Population Survey (n=220,601, ages 25-64). Self-reported health was dichotomized as having reported poor/fair or good/very good/excellent health status. We produced a four-level measure of the overlap between residential and policy contexts indicating whether the respondent lived in a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area within a state that had or had not expanded Medicaid coverage by 2023. Hierarchical linear models, were fit following a logisctic distribution to examine the association between our measure of residence-policy overlaps and poor/fair self-reported health status while accounting for individual and state-level characteristics.
    • <b>Results:</b> About 3.7% of respondents resided in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states. Approximately 11.4% of respondents reported poor/fair self-reported health, with respondents living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion states having the highest rates of poor/fair self-reported health status (18.1%). Living in a nonmetropolitan area within non-expansion states was associated with higher probability of reporting poor/fair self-reported health status for the overall population and by sex.
    • <b>Conclusion:</b> In this nationally representative and racially diverse sample, we found that individuals residing in nonmetropolitan areas in non-expansion Medicaid states were more likely to report poor/fair self-reported health status. This effect was present for the majority of the population subgroups. Our findings underscore the double vulnerability faced by populations living in these residence-policy overlaps and the need for targeted interventions.
    Publication Date
    • 2025-06-01
    • 2025-04-10
  • Updated Creator Michael D. Segovia
  • Updated Creator P. Johnelle Sparks
  • Renamed Creator Alexis R. Santos-Lozada Show Changes
    • Alexis Santos
    • Alexis R. Santos-Lozada