Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics, and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting

Existing systems for online civic engagement and public consultation need a better architecture if they are to realize the aspirations of deliberative democracy. To improve the design of such systems, we develop an empirical model of online civic engagement that connects common game mechanics to four key democratic processes and outcomes—inclusion, deliberative engagement, sound and influential public input, and long-term civic impacts. We then link game mechanics and deliberation with theories of motivation to show how these mechanics can leverage people’s drives to fulfill basic needs, forge social connections, and gain status. To illustrate our model in more concrete terms, we show how game mechanics could motivate both participants and policymakers in an online participatory budgeting system. We conclude by describing a multi-stage experimental approach to testing this model within an existing system of online participatory budgeting.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics, and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. John Gastil
  2. Michael Broghammer
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Political Studies
Publication Date February 1, 2021
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890815
Deposited December 14, 2021

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added Gastil_and_Broghammer_-_Linking_theories_-_Pol_Studies_2021.pdf
  • Added Creator John Gastil
  • Added Creator Michael Broghammer
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated