Why So Contrived? Fourth Amendment Balancing, Per Se Rules, and DNA Databases After Maryland v. King

Submitted in September 2013, this article appeared in Northwestern Law School's Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 535-595, May 2014. An abstract is available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2376467.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Why So Contrived? Fourth Amendment Balancing, Per Se Rules, and DNA Databases After Maryland v. King
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. David Kaye
Keyword
  1. DNA databases, arrest, Fourth Amendment, search or seizure, Maryland v. King, biometric identification
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Work Type Article
Subject
  1. Constitutionality of collecting DNA from arrestees
Language
  1. English
Related URLs
Deposited September 30, 2014

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added rjd472x54d_version1_2014-JCLC_King_.pdf
  • Added Creator David Kaye
  • Published