Comparison of Repeat Versus Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Retrospective Multicenter Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies comparing neurological and radiographic outcomes of repeat to initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intracranial arteriovenous malformations are scarce. Our aim was to perform a retrospective matched comparison of patients initially treated with SRS with those undergoing a second radiosurgical procedure.

METHODS: We collected data from arteriovenous malformations managed in 21 centers that underwent initial and repeated radiosurgery from 1987 to 2022. Based on arteriovenous malformations volume, margin dose, deep venous drainage, deep, and critical location, we matched 1:1 patients who underwent an initial SRS for treatment-naive arteriovenous malformations and a group with repeated SRS treatment.

RESULTS: After the selection process, our sample consisted of 328 patients in each group. Obliteration in the initial SRs group was 35.8% at 3 and 56.7% at 5 years post-SRS, while the repeat SRS group showed obliteration rates of 33.9% at 3 years and 58.6% at 5 years, without statistically significant differences (P = .75 and P = .88, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for obliteration rates (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .5), overall radiation-induced changes (RIC) (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.75-1.6; P = .6), symptomatic RIC (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .4), and post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.68; 95% CI; P = .3).

CONCLUSION: In matched cohort analysis, a second SRS provides comparable outcomes in obliteration and RIC compared with the initial SRS. Dose reduction on repeat SRS may not be warranted.

Files

Metadata

Work Title Comparison of Repeat Versus Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Retrospective Multicenter Matched Cohort Study
Access
Open Access
Creators
  1. Eduardo Orrego Gonzalez
  2. Georgios Mantziaris
  3. Ahmed Shaaban
  4. Robert M. Starke
  5. Dale Ding
  6. John Y.K. Lee
  7. David Mathieu
  8. Douglas Kondziolka
  9. Caleb Feliciano
  10. Inga S. Grills
  11. Gene H. Barnett
  12. L. Dade Lunsford
  13. Roman Liščák
  14. Cheng Chia Lee
  15. Roberto Martinez Álvarez
  16. Selcuk Peker
  17. Yavuz Samanci
  18. Kevin M. Cockroft
  19. Manjul Tripathi
  20. Joshua D. Palmer
  21. Gabriel Zada
  22. Christopher P. Cifarelli
  23. Ahmed M. Nabeel
  24. Stylianos Pikis
  25. Jason P. Sheehan
Keyword
  1. Arteriovenous malformation
  2. Stereotactic radiosurgery
  3. Obliteration
  4. Stroke
License In Copyright (Rights Reserved)
Work Type Article
Publisher
  1. Neurosurgery
Publication Date April 16, 2024
Publisher Identifier (DOI)
  1. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002950
Deposited March 04, 2025

Versions

Analytics

Collections

This resource is currently not in any collection.

Work History

Version 1
published

  • Created
  • Added comparison_of_repeat_versus_initial_stereotactic.21.pdf
  • Added Creator Eduardo Orrego Gonzalez
  • Added Creator Georgios Mantziaris
  • Added Creator Ahmed Shaaban
  • Added Creator Robert M. Starke
  • Added Creator Dale Ding
  • Added Creator John Y.K. Lee
  • Added Creator David Mathieu
  • Added Creator Douglas Kondziolka
  • Added Creator Caleb Feliciano
  • Added Creator Inga S. Grills
  • Added Creator Gene H. Barnett
  • Added Creator L. Dade Lunsford
  • Added Creator Roman Liščák
  • Added Creator Cheng Chia Lee
  • Added Creator Roberto Martinez Álvarez
  • Added Creator Selcuk Peker
  • Added Creator Yavuz Samanci
  • Added Creator Kevin M. Cockroft
  • Added Creator Manjul Tripathi
  • Added Creator Joshua D. Palmer
  • Added Creator Gabriel Zada
  • Added Creator Christopher P. Cifarelli
  • Added Creator Ahmed M. Nabeel
  • Added Creator Stylianos Pikis
  • Added Creator Jason P. Sheehan
  • Published
  • Updated
  • Updated Keyword, Description, Publication Date Show Changes
    Keyword
    • Arteriovenous malformation, Stereotactic radiosurgery, Obliteration, Stroke
    Description
    • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies comparing neurological and radiographic outcomes of repeat to initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intracranial arteriovenous malformations are scarce. Our aim was to perform a retrospective matched comparison of patients initially treated with SRS with those undergoing a second radiosurgical procedure. METHODS: We collected data from arteriovenous malformations managed in 21 centers that underwent initial and repeated radiosurgery from 1987 to 2022. Based on arteriovenous malformations volume, margin dose, deep venous drainage, deep, and critical location, we matched 1:1 patients who underwent an initial SRS for treatment-naive arteriovenous malformations and a group with repeated SRS treatment. RESULTS: After the selection process, our sample consisted of 328 patients in each group. Obliteration in the initial SRs group was 35.8% at 3 and 56.7% at 5 years post-SRS, while the repeat SRS group showed obliteration rates of 33.9% at 3 years and 58.6% at 5 years, without statistically significant differences (P = .75 and P = .88, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for obliteration rates (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .5), overall radiation-induced changes (RIC) (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.75-1.6; P = .6), symptomatic RIC (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .4), and post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.68; 95% CI; P = .3). CONCLUSION: In matched cohort analysis, a second SRS provides comparable outcomes in obliteration and RIC compared with the initial SRS. Dose reduction on repeat SRS may not be warranted.
    • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies comparing neurological and radiographic outcomes of repeat to initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intracranial arteriovenous malformations are scarce. Our aim was to perform a retrospective matched comparison of patients initially treated with SRS with those undergoing a second radiosurgical procedure.
    • METHODS: We collected data from arteriovenous malformations managed in 21 centers that underwent initial and repeated radiosurgery from 1987 to 2022. Based on arteriovenous malformations volume, margin dose, deep venous drainage, deep, and critical location, we matched 1:1 patients who underwent an initial SRS for treatment-naive arteriovenous malformations and a group with repeated SRS treatment.
    • RESULTS: After the selection process, our sample consisted of 328 patients in each group. Obliteration in the initial SRs group was 35.8% at 3 and 56.7% at 5 years post-SRS, while the repeat SRS group showed obliteration rates of 33.9% at 3 years and 58.6% at 5 years, without statistically significant differences (P = .75 and P = .88, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for obliteration rates (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .5), overall radiation-induced changes (RIC) (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.75-1.6; P = .6), symptomatic RIC (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .4), and post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.68; 95% CI; P = .3).
    • CONCLUSION: In matched cohort analysis, a second SRS provides comparable outcomes in obliteration and RIC compared with the initial SRS. Dose reduction on repeat SRS may not be warranted.
    Publication Date
    • 2024-10-01
    • 2024-04-16