Assessing the restorativeness of American school discipline programmes
Restorative justice principles have been lauded for their potential to decrease school-based disparities in discipline, especially due to the disproportionately negative impact on minority students and students with disabilities. Despite high levels of financial investment, little remains known about the quality of restorative justice programmes or the specific mechanism by which restorativeness is embedded into these approaches. Using the Olson and Sarver (2020) Restorative Index as a validation tool, this study assesses the level of restorativeness of 12 school-based restorative justice programmes. These programmes were identified and included on the basis of the fact that they were implemented within a U.S. school, sought to address a specific student behaviour or set of student behaviours through a restorative practice, and were subject to at least one outcomes study available in an English language journal, thesis/dissertation, or report. Findings indicate a mixed level of restorative quality between programmes, with outward engagement domains of restorativeness less likely to be evident in programmes when compared to more traditionally known elements of restorative justice. In addition, U.S. based school restorative justice programmes continue to rely on discipline-oriented practices despite claims of change. We discuss implications for both the Restorative Index and the restorative justice discipline.
Files
Metadata
Work Title | Assessing the restorativeness of American school discipline programmes |
---|---|
Access | |
Creators |
|
License | In Copyright (Rights Reserved) |
Work Type | Article |
Publisher |
|
Publication Date | March 21, 2024 |
Publisher Identifier (DOI) |
|
Deposited | January 23, 2025 |
Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.