When Visual Communication Backfires: Reactance to Three Aspects of Imagery
Although many persuasive messages include imagery, relatively little is known about the potential for the visual components to induce reactance. This research examined the effects of three message variations—camera angle (low vs. eye-level), antithesis (vs. thesis) (i.e., the juxtaposition of contrasting images), and facial expression of emotion (anger vs. happiness)—on reactance and subsequent persuasion. Two experiments (N = 240 and N = 259) using pro-environmental appeals found that variation in each of the visual features was associated with increased perception of threat to freedom, reactance and decreased persuasion. Political conservatives felt more threatened by any message than liberals, but were not differentially sensitive to image variations. This research opens the door for a programmatic analysis of imagery and reactance.
Files
Metadata
| Work Title | When Visual Communication Backfires: Reactance to Three Aspects of Imagery |
|---|---|
| Access | |
| Creators |
|
| License | CC BY 4.0 (Attribution) |
| Work Type | Article |
| Publisher |
|
| Publication Date | January 1, 2025 |
| Publisher Identifier (DOI) |
|
| Deposited | April 14, 2025 |
Versions
Analytics
Collections
This resource is currently not in any collection.